Policy Gridlock, Lipid Tightness, and the Biofuel Ceiling
- Henri Bardon
- 6 days ago
- 3 min read
As Washington’s shutdown drags on, the conversation across U.S. agriculture has turned from frustration to self-examination. Soybean exports remain the focal point of the political blame game, especially as new USTR port taxes on Chinese vessels threaten to aggravate the rift with America’s largest soy buyer. The timing could hardly be worse—harvest progress is nearing 40%, and with bins filling rapidly, the next two weeks will likely expose storage and transport bottlenecks. While the administration defers a domestic farm-aid program until the government reopens, it quietly authorized a $20 billion foreign-exchange support for Argentina, raising questions about priorities. USDA is not idle, however. Southeast Asian buyers from Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand toured U.S. soybean farms this week under the Northern Soy Marketing initiative, part of a push to cultivate non-Chinese markets. These visits emphasize amino-acid profiles and reliability of supply—differentiators against South American beans with higher protein but more volatile logistics. Farmers’ message is simple: “We just need to sell some soybeans.” Yet margins remain deeply negative, with cash-flow models showing losses near $170 per acre for soybeans and $190 per acre for corn, leaving even experienced growers on edge. In the U.S. biofuels complex, D4 RINs slipped to $1.04 while the biodiesel screen-crush margin remains near –50 ¢/gal, keeping producers reluctant to hedge amid uncertain 45Z guidance. Road-diesel consumption continues to track below last year, and policy volatility has left buyers sidelined. While ethanol demand shows slight resilience thanks to slower EV adoption and stronger gasoline draw, biodiesel and RD output remain capped by feedstock costs and muted confidence.

Across the Atlantic, market activity in Northwest Europe was heavier though sentiment stayed soft. The ARAG window was active, but FAME 0 traded down to $1,310/mt while RME held $1,398/mt. The UCOME/RME spread widened to +99/mt, a new high, while RME/FAME 0 settled $88/mt. HVO Class II firmed to $2,643/mt and SAF to $2,705/mt—narrowing the spread to levels that favor renewable-diesel blending over SAF sales. Soft oils gained roughly €10/mt, with rapeseed oil widening its backwardation amid Rhine navigation constraints while soyoil stayed flat-curved on steady imports and cautious crusher activity.
In Asia, the tone turned distinctly firmer. Crude palm oil futures extended gains for a second day, with December closing at RM 4,546/t ($1,079), a seven-week high supported by speculative buying and renewed policy optimism. Indonesia’s energy ministry confirmed that it is targeting B50 implementation in the second half of 2026, contingent on successful completion of road and machinery tests. The announcement lifted sentiment across palm and olein markets, pushing Indonesian FOB offers near $1,150/t for November. Freight from Southeast Asia to the west coast of India has already firmed, with CPO CFR WCI around $1,165/t, and similar tightening is emerging on routes to China and Pakistan as tank space shrinks. The stronger palm complex, coupled with firmer crude and speculative positioning, has re-energized the regional vegoil curve. China’s post-Golden Week reopening adds potential demand but buyers remain cautious as crush margins stay high and meal stocks heavy. Elsewhere, Brazil’s biodiesel outlook turned slightly softer after authorities confirmed that the planned move to B16 in March 2026 will be postponed, keeping the national blend at B14 for now. That delay removes a key leg of near-term global vegoil demand, offsetting some of the tightening pressure from Indonesia’s program and reinforcing how policy timing can swing regional balances.
IEA’s Renewables 2025: The Lipid Ceiling Becomes Structural: The International Energy Agency’s Renewables 2025 transport outlook, released yesterday (October 8), captures a pivotal inflection point for global biofuels. Stronger mandates across Europe, Brazil, and emerging markets lift demand through 2030—but growth leans heavily on lipid feedstocks, exposing structural constraints. By 2030, vegetable oils and residue oils will supply nearly 40% of total biofuel output (45% in the accelerated case). Biofuel use is expected to absorb 27% of global vegetable-oil supply and 80% of waste/residue-oil potential, up from roughly 21% and 50% today. This “lipid lock” explains the persistence of firm BOGO and UCO/tallow premiums and the chronic margin compression seen across biodiesel, RD, and SAF. Policy frameworks are converging on performance-based standards—from RED III in Europe to LCFS and 45Z in the U.S.—rewarding low-CI fuels and verified traceability over volume. These systems already underpin nearly one-third of global biofuel demand and will exceed 60% of transport energy in Europe by 2030. Aviation and maritime fuels emerge as policy-led growth niches, with ReFuelEU, UK SAF, and FuelEU Maritime mandates enforcing uptake regardless of spreads. The IEA warns that without rapid scale-up of non-lipid pathways—cellulosic ethanol, FT-diesel, and alcohol-to-jet—the accelerated-case scenario will collide with feedstock scarcity well before decade’s end.
The alignment between policy momentum and physical constraint is already most visible in Asia, where palm-based blending programs, tightening freight, and delayed Latin-American mandates illustrate exactly the “lipid ceiling” the IEA now quantifies. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/76ad6eac-2aa6-4c55-9a55-b8dc0dba9f9e/Renewables2025.pdf




Comments